Analysis of over 22,000 detections revealed that safety-related elements dominated urban spaces with 56.4% of all detections, followed by proximity elements (22.5%), autonomy elements (9.7%), vitality elements (6.4%), diversity elements (4.9%), and representativeness elements (just 0.2%). This distribution indicates a strong emphasis on basic safety infrastructure, with significantly less attention to elements that support broader aspects of inclusive urban design. Significant variations were observed between cities. Medellín (Colombia) showed the highest concentration of urban characteristics with 6,904 detections and a more balanced approach to urban design compared to other cities. Southeast Asian cities showed distinctly different patterns: Bangkok presented the lowest proportion of safety features among large cities (36.3%), while exhibiting the highest percentage of proximity (27.0%) and autonomy (16.3%) features. In contrast, smaller South American cities showed extreme distributions, with 83.1% of security elements in Rosario (Argentina).

Regional differences were especially notable in the autonomy category, where Southeast Asian cities averaged higher proportions of autonomy-related items (11.3% in Hanoi, 16.3% in Bangkok) compared to South American cities (3.6% in Jaraguá do Sul, 2.6% in Rosario). Similarly, proximity elements showed a greater distribution throughout the urban fabric in Southeast Asian cities (average 23.4%) compared to the more concentrated patterns of South American cities along the main corridors (average 15.7%). The representativeness category proved to be highly underrepresented in all cities, never exceeding 0.4% of detections anywhere, suggesting a systematic gap in urban design approaches that address cultural and community identity through physical elements.

Spatial analysis revealed that urban elements tended to cluster along major transportation corridors and around key nodes, with Southeast Asian cities showing more diverse element mixes compared to the security-dominated clusters of South American cities. The results highlight the urgent need to equitably distribute and endow urban space among neighborhoods, regardless of their size, density or location. Medellín serves as an exemplary case of urban development that prioritizes perceptions of safety through large-scale, multidimensional interventions, while Cuenca (Ecuador) illustrates significant deficiencies and very little diversity in the provision of basic elements in public space in its peripheral areas.

This study represents an important step in the understanding of urban safety, establishing a foundation for future research and targeted intervention strategies throughout Latin America and Southeast Asia. By leveraging AI for street-level image analysis, it demonstrates a replicable method for accurately processing open image data and qualitative analysis in public spaces, providing urban planners and policy makers with valuable information to develop more equitable and inclusive cities.